“Reasonable” Concessions to Climate Hysteria Lack Reason

What reasonable concession would anyone make towards someone who wants to kill you? Maybe if we cut our left hand off, is that a concession? Or should we just offer to kill 20´% of any given population? There can be concessions with players who both use reason and try to find a workable compromise they intend to stick to. Thats not the case for extremists. For them, it’s all or nothing. It’s a mortal threat and we have a clear choice. Either we make sure that those threats are dealt with according to the law, or they will stop short of nothing but eliminating us. Simple choices. 

Linkedin Thread