It is telling that climate activists have such a strong need to stifle any debate that does not ensure the results they have pre-approved. If you have a strong point in a debate, wouldn’t you seek the debate? You have a strong point after all so the others can only get bloodied if debating with you so you would want that. You would seek debate as you are sure to win. A contrario, you would most likely want to kill any debate if you knew that your points are weak or false. Does not shine a positive light on the alarmists I would say.
Leading climate scientist Professor Michael Mann is urging YouTube to take down climate denial and misinformation videos the way it removes Covid-19 misinformation videos.